What factor is cited as a minor, secondary contribution to the resolution of the paradox related to local galactic light?
Answer
Light from stars within our galaxy potentially being blocked or scattered by dust
Historically, light blockage by intervening dust within the galactic plane was considered, although modern cosmology regards the finite age and expansion as the primary, overwhelmingly effective solutions.
#Videos
Why is it Dark at Night? - YouTube
Related Questions
What is the historical conundrum concerning the expected brightness of a dark night sky called?Which three assumptions underpin the paradox formulated by Olbers?In the flux form of the paradox, how is the light received from each successive, equal-thickness shell of stars kept constant?What does the line-of-sight form of Olbers' paradox predict if the universe is infinite and uniformly filled with stars?What property of the modern universe directly results in the existence of a particle horizon?How does the expansion of space affect the light emitted by the most distant, ancient objects in the universe?To which specific range of the electromagnetic spectrum is the ancient light from the early universe shifted due to expansion?If the universe were static, what appearance would the CMB radiation present to the human eye?What is the cosmological boundary beyond which sources are receding faster than the speed of light, meaning their light will never reach us?When accounting for the total radiation budget from cosmic history (stars and black holes), where does the re-emitted energy, after absorption by dust, primarily peak?What factor is cited as a minor, secondary contribution to the resolution of the paradox related to local galactic light?