Why was the early suggestion that cosmic dust absorbs distant starlight insufficient to resolve the paradox?
Answer
The dust would eventually heat up and glow as brightly as the stars themselves
If enough dust were present to block the light from an infinite number of stars, that dust would absorb a vast amount of energy, causing it to reach thermal equilibrium and emit light at the same intensity as the stars it was obscuring.
Related Questions
What is the paradox describing why the night sky should be bright but appears dark?What initial assumption about the universe allowed thinkers to create the basis for Olbers' Paradox?Why was the early suggestion that cosmic dust absorbs distant starlight insufficient to resolve the paradox?What fundamental concept, related to the Big Bang, provides the first key solution to the darkness of the night sky?What is the specific term for the boundary defining the maximum distance light could have traveled to reach us since the universe began?Due to the expansion of space, what is the current approximate radius of the observable universe?What physical effect caused by the expansion of space shifts the ancient, high-energy light from the young universe into lower energy ranges?What is the relic radiation from the Big Bang called, which is spread throughout space but shifted out of the visible spectrum?If an observer possessed eyes sensitive only to microwave wavelengths, how would the night sky appear?What is the long-term consequence for the night sky due to the accelerated expansion of the universe?