According to the text, why were Galileo's initial empirical observations insufficient proof against the established order?
Answer
They did not constitute the airtight, mathematical proof required by the academic framework.
The resistance was partly due to the method of persuasion; the observations were compelling but did not immediately nullify the entire established physics supporting a stationary Earth by providing the overwhelming mathematical proof demanded.
Related Questions
What complex entanglement characterized the rejection of Galileo's findings?What was the foundation of European thought that Galileo's work challenged?Which observation made by Galileo strongly supported the heliocentric model?According to the text, why were Galileo's initial empirical observations insufficient proof against the established order?What argument did Galileo offer regarding the interpretation of scriptural passages that seemed to contradict heliocentrism?What warning did Cardinal Robert Bellarmine issue to Galileo in 1616?In what year did Galileo publish the *Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems*?What was perceived as the political insult in Galileo's *Dialogue* that angered Pope Urban VIII?What event culminated in Galileo being forced to formally renounce his belief in the moving Earth?What was the immediate consequence of Galileo's sentence following the 1633 trial?What is the historical status of the famous phrase, 'And yet it moves' (*Eppur si muove*)?