What trade-off means a high-quality, smaller refractor that is ready quickly might offer better value than a large scope that sits unused?
Answer
The user's tolerance for setup and teardown time
A practical trade-off exists where the time and effort required to assemble and align a large instrument can lead to it remaining stored away, meaning a quicker-to-use, smaller scope provides more actual observing time.
#Videos
What Are Two Disadvantages Of Refracting Telescopes? - YouTube
Related Questions
What accessory required for tracking celestial objects can often cost as much as, or exceed, the price of the telescope tube itself?Which optical flaw specifically plagues cheaper or older achromatic refracting telescopes, resulting in a colored halo around bright objects?What maintenance procedure, involving the precise alignment of mirrors, must be checked and adjusted before nearly every use on a reflecting telescope?What optical defect, particularly associated with faster telescope designs, causes stars near the edge of the viewing field to look stretched or like tiny comets?What astronomical term describes the effect of atmospheric turbulence that causes stars to twinkle aggressively and blurs fine planetary detail?For an urban astronomer, what type of overlooked expense must be factored into the real-world cost of observing sessions?What is the primary visual limitation that prevents deep-sky objects like nebulae from appearing in vibrant color through an eyepiece, even with large apertures?What trade-off means a high-quality, smaller refractor that is ready quickly might offer better value than a large scope that sits unused?What specific physical characteristic of reflecting telescopes introduces a measurable reduction in image contrast compared to a pure refractor design?What unique, often insurmountable drawback do space-based telescopes face compared to ground-based equipment?