How does the reliability of crater counting change when estimating the age of very old terrains versus younger features?
Answer
It is exquisitely sensitive for very old terrains but less precise for younger features
Early in the solar system, the impact rate dropped off sharply, meaning small density differences represent huge age gaps (high sensitivity). Later, when the rate stabilized, the relationship flattened, requiring morphology for precision in young features.
Related Questions
What technique is foundational for determining the relative age of craters on airless bodies?If Crater A clearly cuts across the rim of Crater B, what is the relative age conclusion?Which surface characteristic generally indicates an older terrain when using crater density measurements?How does the rim of a very young crater typically appear compared to an old one?Compared to the vacuum of the Moon, what environmental factor causes faster degradation of crater rims on Mars?What is a key morphological indicator suggesting a crater is significantly older?Why is a direct visual comparison of degradation states between a lunar crater and a Martian crater often unreliable for determining identical ages?What is required to assign an *absolute* date to craters on the Moon or Mars, as opposed to a relative age?What is the primary role of finding geological units with known ages (e.g., Apollo landing sites) when dating impact history?How does the reliability of crater counting change when estimating the age of very old terrains versus younger features?