Why does the simple linear form of Hubble’s Law fail for high-redshift objects?
Answer
The universe's expansion rate has not been constant over the entire light travel time.
The linear approximation assumes a constant expansion rate, but for high redshifts, the expansion rate has changed over cosmic history due to factors like matter and dark energy, invalidating the simple linear formula.
Related Questions
What is the primary tool astronomers use to gauge the distance to distant cosmic sources?What physically defines a redshift ($z$)?How is the mathematical definition of redshift ($z$) calculated?What are the three primary causes listed for the stretching or shifting of light?What fundamentally causes the cosmological redshift observed in distant galaxies?What does a greater measured redshift ($z$) directly correlate with for an observed object?What relationship does Hubble’s Law formalize for relatively nearby galaxies?What physical quantity does the proportionality constant, $H_0$, in Hubble’s Law represent?For small redshifts ($z ext{ less than 1}$), how is the recession velocity ($v$) approximated?Why does the simple linear form of Hubble’s Law fail for high-redshift objects?What is required to accurately determine the physical distance to an object with a very high redshift ($z$)?What is typically observed for local objects like the Andromeda Galaxy, contrasting with distant receding galaxies?