Which design generally offers the best light-gathering aperture performance relative to its manufacturing cost?
Answer
Reflectors.
Mirrors are cheaper to manufacture than large, perfect lenses, allowing reflectors to achieve much larger apertures for the same price point, leading to superior light-gathering capability for deep-sky viewing.
Related Questions
What fundamental capability do telescopes universally provide over the unaided eye?Which specific telescope parameter directly determines its light-gathering power?What specific optical issue commonly affects simpler refracting telescopes?What optical drawback is specifically introduced by the secondary mirror in a reflector design?Which optical design achieves long focal lengths within a very short tube length by folding the light path?If magnification is pushed too high relative to the aperture, what is the resulting effect on the image?Compared to reflectors, why are refractors generally considered very low maintenance?Which design generally offers the best light-gathering aperture performance relative to its manufacturing cost?What term describes the atmospheric turbulence that distorts the image during observation?What risk do many first-time buyers face regarding complex, high-quality instruments?What is the typical physical cause of the narrow field of view in a telescope compared to the naked eye?