When dating ancient terrain, why should researchers focus on counting the largest craters rather than the smallest ones?
Answer
Massive impacts are rare, and their large features are long-lasting, providing information on the oldest geological events.
Counting only the largest craters provides information on the oldest geological events because these massive impacts are rare, and their features are long-lasting, unlike very small craters which can be quickly erased by weathering or minor events.
#Videos
How Planets Show Their Age: Impact Crater Analysis on Mars
Related Questions
What fundamental concept does observing the density and state of impact craters on a world like the Moon reveal?What is the technique called that relies on the premise that longer exposed surfaces accumulate more impact scars?What specific measurement is derived when a researcher normalizes the count of impact craters to a standard area, such as per square kilometer?Which historical period was marked by an intensely high impact flux that heavily bombarded all solid bodies in the solar system?When dating ancient terrain, why should researchers focus on counting the largest craters rather than the smallest ones?What is the main obstacle preventing the simple conversion of observed crater density into an absolute age measurement in years?What specific data source allows scientists to create a calibrated crater production function in years for the Moon?What contextual analysis tool allows geologists to establish a relative chronology by determining which crater formed after another?Which two processes are specifically identified as driving the degradation of older craters on the Moon?When transferring the lunar crater production function to Mars, what is the primary source of systematic uncertainty introduced?