How does the metallicity (elements heavier than helium) generally compare in very old stars (Population II) compared to the Sun (Population I)?
Answer
Their metallicity is significantly lower
Stars born early in the universe had less time for stellar recycling, resulting in a chemical makeup dominated by hydrogen and helium, thus having very low metallicity.
Related Questions
What two elements constitute the vast majority of the light observed from stars?Approximately what percentage of our Sun's total mass is comprised of hydrogen?What process must an object undergo to be classified as a true star?What element almost exclusively begins the nuclear fusion process in a star's core?What element marks the critical turning point where fusion begins to consume energy rather than release it in a massive star's core?During which violent event are elements heavier than iron, such as gold and uranium, typically synthesized?What technique do astronomers use to determine a star's elemental makeup by analyzing its emitted light?How does the metallicity (elements heavier than helium) generally compare in very old stars (Population II) compared to the Sun (Population I)?If the non-H/He fraction of the Sun (about 1%) were calculated using its mass of $2 imes 10^{30} ext{ kg}$, what terrestrial object's mass does that material roughly compare to?Where did the universe's initial supply of hydrogen and helium originate?