What is the modern scientific consensus often favoring over classical panspermia, sometimes called *exogenesis*?
Answer
Focusing on the delivery of non-living chemical building blocks.
While classical panspermia suggests fully formed organisms travel through space, modern research often favors exogenesis, which concentrates on meteorites ferrying the essential, non-living chemical components necessary for biology to begin.
#Videos
Did we find microbial LIFE on an ASTEROID? - YouTube
Related Questions
Which celestial bodies are the main contenders for delivering life-giving chemical materials to early Earth?What fundamental molecules necessary for DNA and RNA structure were discovered in meteorites?What primary difference is noted between the composition of asteroids and comets?What finding supports the idea that chemical pathways for genetics operated outside of Earth?What did the simulation involving the ancient S2 meteorite suggest about the physical impact event?What is the modern scientific consensus often favoring over classical panspermia, sometimes called *exogenesis*?What crucial function might the high-velocity, high-temperature impact event provide besides material delivery?What materials, described as the building blocks of proteins, are carried by asteroids?What made the energy required for synthesizing complex organic molecules in space preferable to synthesizing them entirely on early Earth?What defined the critical 'window of delivery' for cosmic materials to be beneficial?