What has been the consistent outcome in legal or investment scenarios involving prominent claims of water-fueled cars?
Answer
Rulings of fraud or the dissolution of companies after failing to deliver a viable product.
Historically, prominent inventors claiming to run cars on water alone, such as Stanley Meyer, have faced legal action resulting in findings of fraud, underscoring the scientific impossibility of such claims.
Related Questions
What is the fundamental chemical classification of water when considering its use as a direct power source?What does the negative enthalpy of formation ($ ext{-}285.8 ext{ kJ/mol}$) for water signify chemically?Which scientific law governs why a net-positive energy system relying solely on splitting and recombining water is impossible?How does the First Law of Thermodynamics apply to recycling energy recovered from water decomposition?In the context of energy systems, what is the critical distinction between water and gasoline?What condition makes hydrogen derived from splitting water considered 'green hydrogen'?If an electrolyzer is installed in a car powered by gasoline, where does the energy required for splitting the water ultimately come from?What is the role of water in mechanisms like steam engines?What is the function of adding a fine mist of water to the fuel-air mixture in a conventional gasoline engine?What has been the consistent outcome in legal or investment scenarios involving prominent claims of water-fueled cars?