What fundamental limitation does the problem of induction impose on scientific certainty?
Answer
Universal conclusions cannot be drawn with certainty from finite observations.
Science operates largely on induction—observing many instances—but this logical structure means that no matter how many confirming instances are found, the conclusion is always open to refutation by a single contradictory future observation.
Related Questions
How is scientific truth usually characterized, contrasting it with pure mathematics?What causes fundamental limits to knowledge regarding the future states of complex systems?Which category of questions is science scientifically ill-equipped to answer based on its methodology?What primary characteristic must a hypothesis possess to qualify as a scientific claim?What specific challenge does science face when attempting to capture subjective, first-person experience (qualia)?How does the act of observation generally impact the physical system being measured?What event typically triggers a major scientific revolution or paradigm shift?What fundamental limitation does the problem of induction impose on scientific certainty?When scientific findings move from research into the public sphere, what common misunderstanding about certainty arises?How does the reasoning process for achieving absolute certainty contrast with that of scientific knowledge?In the context of scientific discovery, what does the phrase 'we now know' often signify?