What was a major historical factor that delayed the widespread adoption of liquid methane as a primary launch propellant?
Answer
Established infrastructure, legacy knowledge, and the significant capital investment required to switch from mature $ ext{RP-1}$ systems.
The aerospace industry had decades of experience and supply chains built around $ ext{RP-1}$. Transitioning to cryogenic methane involved significant development risk and capital investment, slowing its adoption until newer, complex engine technologies matured.
Related Questions
Which propellant system typically achieves an $ ext{Isp}$ around 350 seconds?What is the primary challenge associated with storing Liquid Hydrogen ($ ext{LH2}$) compared to liquid methane?What advantage does the superior density of liquid methane provide for launch vehicle design?What combustion byproduct issue, notorious in traditional kerosene engines, does methane combustion largely eliminate?What is the critical long-term argument supporting the widespread adoption of methane for deep space exploration missions like Mars?Which chemical process is explicitly named as the method for generating methane propellant on Mars from local resources?Why does methane burn cleaner than kerosene ($ ext{RP-1}$)?Which two specific methalox engines are cited as examples of the next wave of heavy-lift, reusable launch vehicle technology?For a vehicle designed for frequent reusability, what becomes the dominant economic driver for selecting methalox over $ ext{LOX}/ ext{LH2}$?What was a major historical factor that delayed the widespread adoption of liquid methane as a primary launch propellant?