How does a scientific theory differ fundamentally from a hypothesis?
Answer
A theory has survived repeated, rigorous testing and is substantiated by vast evidence.
A hypothesis is tentative and a starting point, whereas a scientific theory represents an explanation that has withstood repeated, rigorous testing across multiple independent lines of inquiry.
Related Questions
What is the initial nature of a scientific hypothesis?What central characteristic must a scientific hypothesis possess to remain within the realm of science?What concept requires a hypothesis to be the simplest explanation that adequately accounts for observations without unnecessary complexity?Which statement is considered specific enough to form a testable hypothesis based on variable identification?In the structure of stating relationships, what does the dependent variable represent?What structure is often used as a common and helpful convention for stating a predictive hypothesis?How does a scientific theory differ fundamentally from a hypothesis?What is the primary distinction between a scientific law and a scientific theory?What are the two primary routes for subjecting a hypothesis to empirical testing?What is the strategic importance of the null hypothesis ($ ext{H}_0$) during hypothesis testing?