Why is Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) often computationally prohibitive for fully turbulent flows?
Answer
The required resolution scales with the Reynolds number cubed.
Direct Numerical Simulation requires simulating every swirling eddy, meaning the computational effort scales very rapidly with the Reynolds number, making it prohibitively expensive for high Re turbulent flows.
Related Questions
What is the fundamental characteristic distinguishing laminar flow from turbulent flow?How is the velocity profile typically described in a steady laminar flow condition?Under which fluid dynamic conditions is laminar flow typically observed?In engineering applications focused on maximizing heat transfer between a fluid and a surface, which flow regime is generally preferred?The Reynolds number ($ ext{Re}$) is fundamentally a ratio representing which two forces in fluid dynamics?What is a general consequence of turbulence within the boundary layer on moving objects like aircraft?Why is Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) often computationally prohibitive for fully turbulent flows?To restore order to disturbed flow immediately upstream of a sensor sensitive to turbulence, what is a common guideline for straight pipe runs?Which flow behavior is explicitly listed as a subdivision of laminar flow characteristics?According to generally accepted ranges cited for pipe flow, which Reynolds number range defines the transitional flow regime?