What unwarranted value judgment sometimes suggests that social sciences are less rigorous than natural sciences?
Answer
The sentiment that if a concept cannot be perfectly modeled by a neat equation, it is inherently less worthy.
The perception exists that concepts not perfectly captured by simple equations are inherently less worthy of serious scientific consideration, suggesting a lower rigor.
Related Questions
What is the primary focus of academic disciplines labeled as "soft science"?The classification of sciences as "soft" or "hard" primarily relates to what aspect?Which field is specifically mentioned as being grouped under soft sciences despite employing complex mathematical models?What methodological tool is commonly employed in soft sciences alongside statistical surveys?What key challenge in soft science research arises because observation can alter the behavior being measured?In contrast to hard sciences which excel at prediction, what do soft sciences often prioritize?What unwarranted value judgment sometimes suggests that social sciences are less rigorous than natural sciences?Which disciplines are cited as examples that blur the traditional lines between hard and soft sciences?What essential aspect of reality do soft sciences address that cannot be measured by a ruler or a Geiger counter?What do soft sciences explain regarding a bridge that physics cannot?How is scientific rigor increasingly defined by many contemporary social scientists?