What term is considered scientifically more precise than "stardust" when describing the fundamental atomic materials making up human bodies?
Answer
Star stuff
The text suggests that 'star stuff' is a more accurate descriptor than 'stardust' to capture the violent and ancient history required to construct the atoms in our bodies.
Related Questions
What term is considered scientifically more precise than "stardust" when describing the fundamental atomic materials making up human bodies?What elements were overwhelmingly composed of the initial material resulting from Big Bang nucleosynthesis?What is the hard stop for the fusion process within a star's core before gravitational collapse due to energy consumption?Which elements crucial to biology, such as gold and platinum, are forged during the explosive death of a massive star?What process is responsible for creating roughly half of the elements heavier than iron, including iodine necessary for human metabolism?What percentage of all cosmic dust, as defined in astrophysics, is directly created by stars?What percentage of the human body's mass is accounted for by Oxygen?What is the approximate mass percentage contribution of Hydrogen to the human body?What process is solely responsible for transmuting one element into another, such as oxygen into carbon, within a body?Why must the material composing our structure, like iron and calcium, have been recycled across multiple stellar generations?