In complexity analysis involving very large integers, such as those used in cryptography, what nuance in measurement might become relevant?
Answer
Accounting for the number of bits required to represent the numbers, as arithmetic operations may no longer be constant time
When numbers become arbitrarily large, the time taken for arithmetic operations (like addition) is no longer constant but depends on the size (number of bits) of the operands, requiring a finer definition of a single computational step.
#Videos
Algorithms Explained: Computational Complexity
Related Questions
What is computational complexity fundamentally concerned with?What are the two primary resources quantified when measuring computational complexity?What does Big O notation provide when describing resource scaling?What is established by the complexity of the problem itself regarding resource requirements?Which abstract model serves as the standard for rigorous mathematical analysis in complexity theory?What characterizes the decision problems belonging to the class P (Polynomial Time)?What is the critical feature defining problems within the class NP?What are NP-complete problems described as within the class NP?Why are problems requiring exponential time complexity ($O(2^n)$) typically deemed intractable?When analyzing sorting algorithms, why is Merge Sort ($O(n ext{ log } n)$) considered efficient while Bubble Sort ($O(n^2)$) is considered inefficient, even if both are in P?In complexity analysis involving very large integers, such as those used in cryptography, what nuance in measurement might become relevant?