How does taking a vastly increased number of measurements affect random uncertainty versus systematic uncertainty?
Answer
It helps reduce the impact of random uncertainty but does not reduce systematic error.
Repeated measurements help average out random fluctuations, reducing the impact of random uncertainty on the final average. However, since systematic error consistently biases every reading, more measurements only result in a more precise average of the wrong answer.
Related Questions
What is the scientific term for the quantification of doubt inherent in every experimental result?What concept describes how close repeated measurements are to each other?What dictates the lowest level of detail a scientist can record when reading a standard calibrated scale?What specific human factor contributes uncertainty when reading the meniscus in a graduated cylinder?What phenomenon involving apparatus structure is an example of an environmental factor introducing instrumental uncertainty?Which type of uncertainty causes measurements to consistently shift in one direction away from the true value?How does taking a vastly increased number of measurements affect random uncertainty versus systematic uncertainty?When combining independent sources of uncertainty in a calculation, what common method involves adding the squares of the individual uncertainties?What is the crucial rule of thumb for rounding the uncertainty when reporting a final calculated result?Besides direct measurement limitations, where does uncertainty arise when interpreting experimental data?