How are GNWT and IIT fundamentally distinguished in terms of their theoretical approach?
Answer
GNWT is primarily functionalist, while IIT is structural/informational
GNWT focuses on the *function* of broadcasting information across networks, whereas IIT focuses on the inherent *structure* of causal relationships within the physical substrate, quantified by $\Phi$.
Related Questions
What is the definition of the Neural Correlates of Consciousness (NCC)?Which experimental paradigm involves presenting different images simultaneously to each eye causing perception to alternate?How do researchers attempt to isolate NCCs using physical stimuli?What mechanism is thought to transform a fleeting trace into a stable, reportable conscious experience?Which specific frequency band is associated with the synchronization hypothesized to bind disparate features into a unified conscious percept?What does the Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT) posit is required for sensory information to enter consciousness?According to the Integrated Information Theory (IIT), what is consciousness equivalent to?How are GNWT and IIT fundamentally distinguished in terms of their theoretical approach?In states like deep sleep or under anesthesia, what do studies reveal about the brain activity related to lost conscious report?What index is used in clinical neurology to measure the brain's capacity for complex, integrated responses in patients with disorders of consciousness?