standard articles
What is the fundamental purpose of the peer review assessment process?
What primary function does scrutiny by peer reviewers serve for scientific journals?
Which specific issue might a reviewer flag related to study execution or design?
When a paper moves to a 'Major Revision' decision, what does this typically imply about the manuscript?
How is a reviewer functionally described in terms of the expertise they provide during the feedback stage?
Beyond confirming technical correctness, what crucial element must peer review assess regarding the research contribution?
What often constitutes the majority of required changes before a paper's acceptance, according to observational data?
When structuring a point-by-point response letter, what specific information should authors systematically detail for every reviewer comment?
What characteristic of a rejected paper, according to the feedback type table, leads to its rejection even if technically sound?
How does peer review ultimately support the collective body of scientific knowledge?
What does the abbreviation "SI" in SI units stand for?
How many independent base units form the foundation of the SI system?
Which body formalizes and maintains the current structure of the SI system?
In what year were the SI units officially redefined to be based on nature’s inherent constants?
Prior to the 2019 redefinition, what physical object defined the standard for the kilogram?
The kilogram is now derived by fixing the value of which physical constant?
What specific phenomenon is the definition of the second (time) currently tied to?
Which derived SI unit is equivalent to $\text{kg} \cdot \text{m}/\text{s}^2$ and represents force?
What characteristic of SI prefixes ensures they prevent ambiguity in international documentation?